Monday, January 25, 2010

QUEEN HILLARY'S CHECK MATE





Chess is a war game..

You win by playing your opponent, not the game.

The patient, wily, and deft player often triumphs more frequently than the flashy, lightening quick one. A grand master will pick off the pawns as they cross into enemy territory and then concentrate on checking the King. The Queen has the greatest maneuverability of all the chess pieces. She can be the most lethal. The King, by contrast, is often barricaded behind a wall of defenders, with little room to escape.

The King is dying. Long live the Queen.
Quietly, and under almost everyone’s radar, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has been vanquishing her foes, while President Barack Obama has been multiplying his. Furthermore, she has been paying off her debts, while Obama has been multiplying his (and the country’s) I.O.U.s. Obama is down in the polls. Clinton is up. He is losing his liberal base and taking heat on health care, the wars, broken promises, gate crashers, the bailouts, and a grand design that leaves his base behind.

As New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd wrote Sunday, “The Obama White House is morphing into the Bush White House with frightening speed. Its transparency is already fogged up.

In a surprise announcement, President Obama endorsed Coakley and encouraged Massachusetts voters to get out and vote for Coakley. Ironically, it was Kennedy’s endorsement of Obama in the Iowa caucus that ended the Clintons’ dreams of reclaiming the White House, and started the vendettas. For the Kennedy family’s efforts, Caroline Kennedy came to believe that she earned appointment to the U.S. Senate seat, eventually vacated by Clinton. Instead, the Governor of New York appointed Kirstin Gillibrand — a Clinton, not an Obama ally — and it is no secret that the Clintons made it happen.Less well known was that Obama did not “lift a finger to help Caroline Kennedy.”Perhaps Caroline, too, hoped for revenge in Massachusetts, but she didn’t get it, instead a Republican was elected and county by county he was voted in by Clinton Democrats thus costing the democrats Ted Kennedy's senate seat as well as the 60th vote needed to pass President Obama's healthcare agenda. Barack Obama at this very point had failed the very same thing that he attacked Hillary Clinton for in the primaries as he reminded voters how "polarizing" her personality was during the Clinton Healthcare Reform of the 1990's.

Clinton’s political obituary
Remember not long ago, Clinton, once seen as becoming the first woman ever elected President of the U.S., was just another spectator at the swearing in of America’s first black President. Clamors of “get out” were blogged from the Obama team after her early, and unexpected, primary defeat in the Iowa caucus.. Indeed, many pundits openly cheered and penned her political obituary, but she trudged onto the snows in New Hampshire. Watching Bill Clinton sit two blocks away from the main polling spot in Exeter (at the chocolate shop) where every local news outlet sat down and interviewed the former President, and almost every poll showed Obama with a nine-point lead, it became obvious that the Clintons were their own best “ground game.” They sensed a change in that frigid New England air. They were right. Clinton turned the tables and won by 3 percent, a 12 percent swing that rocked the polling industry’s credibility.

Next, came the caucus/primary in Nevada, and again I witnessed the Clinton ground game when two Edwards delegates came out of the closed doors almost in tears saying, “They couldn’t even speak English. It was awful.” Clinton’s union supporters bagged Nevada. And in Boston on Tuesday night’s election, we watched another Grand Master chess move. No historian could resist.

King Obama’s weakness
Obama’s lifelong habit of being cautious, voting “present” and splitting everything down the middle, may not get him re-elected. If as the Clintons might already sense, that Obama is in trouble, his biggest threat remains Clinton. Understanding this, and intent on keeping his enemies close, Obama appointed Clinton as Secretary of State, hoping, undoubtedly to woo her ardent supporters and to smother her with irrelevance. Just to be certain that Clinton couldn’t upstage him, Obama appointed several “special envoys” to take over negotiations on the high-profile hot spots of the international stage. The King’s chess move, thought to be “brilliant,” underestimated the patience of the Queen. Ironically, Obama sacrificed another pawn to check the Queen. Just last week, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) –also an Obama supporter in a state that Hillary won large — admitted that he coveted her current post of Secretary of State.That makes Clinton 2; Obama 0. [Caroline Kennedy and John Kerry].
The remaining six pawns
Here are the former foes from the Democratic primary who took on Clinton — as Obama surrogates-hoping to be elevated to Knights, Rooks, or Bishops, but lost it all.

3. John Edwards: 2004 vice presidential candidate, 2008 presidential candidate of the “two Americas” theme, former North Carolina senator, and wannabe Attorney General in the Obama Administration.
Currently, the disgraced philanderer, less than dutiful husband of Elizabeth Edwards, and (after repeated denials of his infidelity) the only prominent national Democrat lower in public approval ratings than House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

4. Bill Richardson: the New Mexico governor, friend and political appointee of the Clintons (watched Super Bowl with Bill before publically turning on the Clintons and endorsing Obama) and wannabe Secretary of State, Commerce-or anything else-under Obama.
Currently, Richardson remains in political purgatory, caused by the taint of “scandals” due to a grand jury investigation into several questionable campaign contributions in multiple alleged “pay-to-play” schemes; (involving local contactors, bond houses and a pension scheme with a Chicago investment firm that dealt with Richardson’s Chief of Staff).
Richardson’s political career cratered into jibes on the late night comedy shows of David Letterman and Jay Leno.

5. Chris Dodd: senator of Connecticut, has announced he will not be seeking re-election.


6. Joe Biden: vice president of the U.S.
Currently, on the losing side of the debate over sending additional troops to Afghanistan. He publicly opposed the escalation in soldiers, preferring instead the option of drones and remote, recessed firepower.
Unflattering pieces about his gaffes and his “standing in the Administration” have begun to circulate in the liberal press — like in a recent column by Sam Stein of The Huffington Post.Add to this his less than competent role on overseeing the stimulus package and detailing its success (with exaggerated numbers and made up Congressional Districts) and you see where his “standing” is headed. The latest poll showed Biden’s approval rating lower than Dick Cheney’s in the same period!

7. However, the most stealth-like, damaging, and perhaps satisfactory capture, came from the inelegant dismissal of former Clinton White House counsel, turned Obama-supporter and Clinton basher, Greg Craig.
Craig, who turned on Clinton during the primaries, did so in a rather nasty, but effective email arguing that she failed the test as commander-in-chief, that her claims of involvement in foreign affairs were bogus, and that she “never answered the phone either to make a decision on any pressing national security issue-not at 3 a.m. or at any other time of day.” Currently, Craig is out of the White House-dismissed in a manner that brought howls, from the liberal activists, and have accelerated the disbelief, doubt, and defections among the Obama “believers”.
As Elizabeth Drew wrote in Politico, the firing was “the shabbiest episode of his presidency.”

8. And finally, Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mon.): head of the Senate Finance Committee overseeing the health care bills.
Baucus has admitted — after repeatedly denying — that he was intimately involved with his state director, when he nominated her for the position of U.S. Attorney from Montana on “her merits.”
Currently under possible ethics violation for the nomination — not the lying, or the tryst, as both parties were separated at the time — Baucus’ political capital has eroded. He, too, competes with Tiger Woods for late night comedy jibes. Baucus’ year is ending badly.

Good year for the queen
Besides vanquishing the eight pawns on the chess board, here are few more victories for the Clintons.
• The last minute save of the Turkish-Armenian accords opening the borders between these two longtime enemies.
• Bill Clinton’s dramatic feel-good rescue of the two female reporters held hostage in North Korea
• Clinton being named No. 4 of the 25 “smartest people” of the decade by the political blog The Daily Beast: “If anyone has a more intellectually rigorous resume for the decade, we have yet to see it.” High praise.
• A flattering article about Clinton in the December issue of Vogue magazine, complete with photos by the legendary Annie Liebowitz.
• The near “irrelevance” of those special envoys Mitchell and Holbrooke. They have been sidelined or mired in diplomatic quicksand.
• The success in adoption of her preferred Afghan strategy — and in securing NATO troop support over the expected 5,000 offered. (Something Clinton lectured Obama about in a primary debate: never get on the plane unless the deal has already been done.)
• Hillary's very quick and elegant handling of the Haiti disaster played out while President Obama remained in the background calling for help from former President Bill Clinton.
• Perhaps the worst damage done to the Obama presidency lies in his slow resonse and poor handling of the Christmas day Yemen terror attack, Something the GOP will take pleasure in reminding Americans that it took the inexperienced President over 72 hours to respond from his multi-million dollar vacation home in Hawaii, taking into concideration that The State Department wasn't on the list for those that failed to stop the attack.

None of this goes without taking into account The Queen’s high 70% approval rating compared to King’s falling into the low 40% margins.

In the meantime, looking towards a possible transfer of power, some are rephrasing the medieval shout, “The King is dying. Long live the Queen.”



I only take credit for updating this blog -
It's original author was Colleen O’Connor, an SDNN political columnist.

Wednesday, January 20, 2010

DEMOCRATS - IT'S HILLARY IN 2012 OR NO MONEY & NO VOTES !!!




Dearest DNC,
You have chosen your own path, you decided to cheat us and America out of the biggest chance for "CHANGE" that America has had in decades. Martha Coakley did nothing wrong, proof? Martha Coakley didn't run for office in Virginia and New Jersey! It is not local issues - we're talking about 3 states... The common denominator of the three states = Barack Obama. This is about Democracy and the fact that EXPERIENCE DID MATTER! It is now obvious...With a majority in both houses - Barack Obama couldn't produce ANY "Change". The 2008 primary was not about what would be inherited... It was about WHO could start fixing the BIG MESS that America was in ON DAY ONE! We are asking that you to help us to MOTIVATE Hillary... Motivate her not only to restore Democracy to the Democratic Party - As Hillary got 18 million votes (which was more votes than ANY presidential primary candidate of ANY party in the HISTORY of our nation), but Motivate her so we can actually make ALL OF THOSE "CHANGE" PROMISES a reality! Hillary WON'T BACK DOWN and WE KNOW THAT. It's her turn and let's watch Washington get cleaned up and cleaned out -I've got my mop and broom ready! Hillary was ELECTED and Obama was SELECTED. Right your Wrong and save your party!
Sincerely,

(If you get a "comment couldn't be posted message" - It sometimes takes 2 tries to post your comment, the first time it will tell you that your comment couldn't be posted and the second time it will go through )

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

COAKLEY LOSS NOT A REFERENDUM ON HER - IT'S OBAMA !!!



Before democratic insiders start blaming Martha Coakley - Let's all look back - In the Massachusetts primaries Barack Obama had a large margin loss to Hillary Clinton despite John Kerry and Ted Kennedy stumping for him. Now in 2010 after a year of the Obama Presidency, Obama endorses Coakley, STUMPS FOR HER and she loses. The fact of the matter is... the common denominator of the Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts ELECTIONS was Barack Obama. Local issues or a candidate have nothing to do with it. In Massachusetts the electorate is largely gay, the gays turned on Obama from minute go when he attacked Hillary (a Gay Icon) in the primaries. Now maybe the message is sent to the DNC - We (Hillary's 18 Million) rather - " Gay or Straight, African American or Caucasian, Hispanic, Chinese, Puerto Rican or Japanese, Rich, Poor, and Middle Class" are not backing down! We are in this until you (The DNC) right your wrong. The DNC cheated Hillary out of an office that she earned and selected Obama using the Super Delegates to be the commander & chief when all of your other cheating ways failed. Did you actually think that we wouldn't be mad that you stole an election, that you cheated 2 states out of their votes, and sent us the message that our votes didn't matter and actually get away with it. Hillary Clinton earned over 18 Million votes - more votes than any presidential primary candidate of either party in the history of our nation. You ignored the wishes of the Democratic base, you chose to side with young inexperienced voters that now aren't interested anymore - We are though, loyal till the end, we protested and you ignored our pleas for justice and Now you (the Democratic leaders) pay the piper while we ( Hillary's 18 million) say LOUD AND CLEAR... Either figure out a way to get her to run in 2012 or lose the Whitehouse as well. WE ARE THE CLINTON MACHINE, THE ARMY OF HILLARY...AND we intend on making sure you realize HILLARY DIDN'T DESERVE WHAT YOU DID TO HER. POLARIZING? Hillary Clinton? Look at your Obama now ... 3 states down and only 47 more to ensure that we don't have another democrat in White House for at least 2 decades... Good Job Barack - Thank You for successfully dividing a party of hope into a party of nope. You HAD a flippin Democratic majority and YOU COULDN'T BRING THAT "CHANGE" YOU PROMISED TO THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA? - In fact the ONLY PART OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION THAT IS SUCCESSFUL - IS THE STATE DEPARTMENT! GO FIGURE! In the words of another Great Hill-Star - Nancy - "If he was elected because of THE FIERCE URGENCY OF NOW THEN WHAT ARE WE ALL STILL DOING WAITING FOR THAT "CHANGE WE COULD BELIEVE IN!"
Tell you what - put Hillary into the position that she was ELECTED to - and the one that you SELECTED Obama for.... GIVE US SOME CHANGE THAT WE CAN "COUNT ON"...and we'll talk about our donations and our votes again...
The 2008 primary election wasn't about what was going to be "INHERITED" - It was about WHO COULD START FIXING THE MESS ON DAY 1 AND OBAMA HAS FAILED!
EXPERIENCE DOES MATTER!
NO MORE "SPIN ZONE" IT'S HILLARY CLINTON IN 2012 or bust!

Response to HAITI



Well here it goes - the first Legendary Hillary Clinton blog and I want to start it off with a BIG THANK YOU for Hillary's hard work in Haiti. Her dedication and unwaivering full hearted TIMELY response as Secretary of State to the needs of the Haitians proves that she was ready on Day One. While Barack Obama has been unseen and unheard (unless he was stumping for Coakley or asking for Bill Clinton's advice)- Hillary Clinton was working hard to secure a efficient humanitarian effort for the Haitian people. Hillary landed in Haiti on Saturday to oversee the relief efforts herself and survey the scene for all American's by drawing much media attention to the catastrophe. Barack Obmama in the meantime landed in Massachusetts on Sunday to make sure his radical, poorly thought out healthcare agenda would have the 60 votes needed for him to claim some kind of victory on this domestic problem. So with a new dawn of a new day I hope the Democrats are listening - Barack Obama is costing you the biggest chance that America had to "Change" our nation... "What happened to the Fierce Urgency of Now?"